MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS vs TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS: 4
vs
TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 115 cal | 70 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 22.3 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 4.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | MAPLE BACON BAKED BEANS | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 46 MG | 31 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 320 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 431 MG | 125 MG |