LUNDS & BYERLYS vs BACON FLAVORED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON FLAVORED ALMONDS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
vs
BACON FLAVORED ALMONDS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNDS & BYERLYS | BACON FLAVORED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 567 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 33.3 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNDS & BYERLYS | BACON FLAVORED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNDS & BYERLYS | BACON FLAVORED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 200 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 467 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 633 MG |