LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS vs CHOCOLATEY COATED MATZOS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS: 7
vs
CHOCOLATEY COATED MATZOS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS | CHOCOLATEY COATED MATZOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 cal | 460 cal | |
| Protein | 13.2 g | 6 g | |
| Carbs | 24.5 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 15.1 g | 18 g | |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS | CHOCOLATEY COATED MATZOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LUNCHABLES HAM AND CHEDDAR CRACKER STACKERS | CHOCOLATEY COATED MATZOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 189 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 415 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 925 MG | 10 MG |