LARGE COOKED SHRIMP vs PANAPESCA SCALLOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP: 6
vs
PANAPESCA SCALLOPS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | PANAPESCA SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | PANAPESCA SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | PANAPESCA SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.1 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 619 MG | 161 MG |