KING COLE vs TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
KING COLE: 3
vs
TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KING COLE | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 72 cal | 85 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 15.2 g | 12.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 5.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KING COLE | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KING COLE | TRADITIONAL REFRIED BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 16 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 231 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 312 MG | 369 MG |