HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS vs BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS: 6
vs
BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 15.2 g | 7.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | BEER BATTERED FISH FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 339 MG | 108 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 196 MG | 735 MG |