GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN vs WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SALMON BURGER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SALMON BURGER wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN: 2
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SALMON BURGER: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SALMON BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 139 cal | |
| Protein | 19.9 g | 20.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.8 g | |
| Fat | 9.9 g | 3.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SALMON BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 5 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND BEEF SIRLOIN | WILD CAUGHT ALASKAN SALMON BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 397 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 66 MG | 430 MG |