GROUND BEEF CHUCK vs SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 1
vs
SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 198 cal | |
| Protein | 17.0 g | 25.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 9.9 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 6.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | SLOW ROASTED CHICK'N TANDOORI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 66 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 352 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 495 MG |