GRILLING SHRIMP vs CALAMARI TUBES & TENTACLES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALAMARI TUBES & TENTACLES wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
GRILLING SHRIMP: 3
vs
CALAMARI TUBES & TENTACLES: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRILLING SHRIMP | CALAMARI TUBES & TENTACLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 40 cal | |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRILLING SHRIMP | CALAMARI TUBES & TENTACLES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 23 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 238,938 MG | 616 MG |