FULLY COOKED ROAST BEEF vs DIETZ & WATSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DIETZ & WATSON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED ROAST BEEF: 1
vs
DIETZ & WATSON: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED ROAST BEEF | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED ROAST BEEF | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED ROAST BEEF | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 911 MG | 643 MG |