FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) vs TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.): 2
vs
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 16 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 329 MG |