FROZEN PINK SHRIMP vs SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FROZEN PINK SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
FROZEN PINK SHRIMP: 4
vs
SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROZEN PINK SHRIMP | SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 9 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 18.2 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROZEN PINK SHRIMP | SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROZEN PINK SHRIMP | SKINLESS & BONELESS PACIFIC COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 73 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 145 MG | 637 MG |