FLAME GRILLED FULLY COOKED CHEDDAR SAUSAGE vs UNCURED BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
FLAME GRILLED FULLY COOKED CHEDDAR SAUSAGE: 4
vs
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FLAME GRILLED FULLY COOKED CHEDDAR SAUSAGE | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 329 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 15.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 5.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 27.9 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FLAME GRILLED FULLY COOKED CHEDDAR SAUSAGE | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FLAME GRILLED FULLY COOKED CHEDDAR SAUSAGE | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 89 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 734 MG | 607 MG |