EMERALD vs DRY ROASTED UNSALTED MACADAMIA NUTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
EMERALD: 5
vs
DRY ROASTED UNSALTED MACADAMIA NUTS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD | DRY ROASTED UNSALTED MACADAMIA NUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 625 cal | 733 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 18.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 56.3 g | 76.7 g | |
| Fiber | 12.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD | DRY ROASTED UNSALTED MACADAMIA NUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD | DRY ROASTED UNSALTED MACADAMIA NUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |