EMERALD vs DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
EMERALD: 5
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 607 cal | 516 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 9.7 g | |
| Carbs | 17.9 g | 51.6 g | |
| Fat | 57.1 g | 38.7 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 9.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 214 MG | 97 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 9.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 571 MG | 484 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |