EMERALD vs UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
EMERALD: 2
vs
UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD | UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 607 cal | 607 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 17.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 57.1 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD | UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD | UNSALTED WHOLE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 214 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 3.9 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 571 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |