DRESSING vs CAESAR VINAIGRETTE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 3
vs
CAESAR VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | CAESAR VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 483 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 30 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 51.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | CAESAR VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | CAESAR VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,267 MG | 552 MG |