DINNER TWINS vs TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DINNER TWINS wins in 5 out of 15 nutrient categories
DINNER TWINS: 5
vs
TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DINNER TWINS | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 250 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DINNER TWINS | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin K (phylloquinone) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DINNER TWINS | TRADITIONAL BATARD SOURDOUGH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 286 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 568 MG |