DIETZ & WATSON vs COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DIETZ & WATSON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
DIETZ & WATSON: 4
vs
COOKED HAM: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DIETZ & WATSON | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DIETZ & WATSON | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DIETZ & WATSON | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 643 MG | 982 MG |