DANCING DEER vs THIN ROSEMARY CRACKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THIN ROSEMARY CRACKER wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
DANCING DEER: 3
vs
THIN ROSEMARY CRACKER: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DANCING DEER | THIN ROSEMARY CRACKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 440 cal | 455 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 63.6 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 15.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DANCING DEER | THIN ROSEMARY CRACKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DANCING DEER | THIN ROSEMARY CRACKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 80 MG | 409 MG |