COOKED WHITE SHRIMP vs PANAPESCA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
COOKED WHITE SHRIMP: 4
vs
PANAPESCA: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED WHITE SHRIMP | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 178 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 24 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6 g | |
| Fat | 1 g | 2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED WHITE SHRIMP | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 18 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED WHITE SHRIMP | PANAPESCA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 120 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 13.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 450 MG | 440 MG |