COOKED SHRIMP vs TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | TILAPIA SKINLESS AND BONELESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 48 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 35 MG |