COOKED SHRIMP vs LOW FAT BAY SCALLOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
LOW FAT BAY SCALLOPS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | LOW FAT BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 57 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 13.1 g | 15.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | LOW FAT BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | LOW FAT BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 48 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 405 MG | 143 MG |