COOKED SHRIMP vs FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.): 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 15.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 518 MG | 71 MG |