COOKED SHRIMP vs TUNA STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
vs
TUNA STEAK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 181 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 40.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 68 MG | 40 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 424 MG | 60 MG |