COOKED HAM vs GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED HAM: 4
vs
GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED HAM | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED HAM | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED HAM | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,321 MG | 282 MG |