COOKED HAM vs CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK wins in 4 out of 8 nutrient categories
COOKED HAM: 2
vs
CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED HAM | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED HAM | CAPOCOLLO LOCALLY PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 714 MG | 1,821 MG |