CLASSIC ORGANIC HUMMUS vs HUMMUS TOPPED WITH CHIPOTLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC ORGANIC HUMMUS: 5
vs
HUMMUS TOPPED WITH CHIPOTLE: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC ORGANIC HUMMUS | HUMMUS TOPPED WITH CHIPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 17.9 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC ORGANIC HUMMUS | HUMMUS TOPPED WITH CHIPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC ORGANIC HUMMUS | HUMMUS TOPPED WITH CHIPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 125 MG | 283 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 607 MG | 400 MG |