CLASSIC ENRICHED WHITE ROLLS vs SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ENRICHED WHITE ROLLS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
CLASSIC ENRICHED WHITE ROLLS: 8
vs
SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC ENRICHED WHITE ROLLS | SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 308 cal | |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 56.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 2.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC ENRICHED WHITE ROLLS | SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 160 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 2.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC ENRICHED WHITE ROLLS | SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 75 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 75 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 375 MG | 513 MG |