CLASSIC CANNED COOKED MEAT vs PORK PATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CANNED COOKED MEAT wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC CANNED COOKED MEAT: 3
vs
PORK PATE: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC CANNED COOKED MEAT | PORK PATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 321 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 8.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 30.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC CANNED COOKED MEAT | PORK PATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC CANNED COOKED MEAT | PORK PATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,411 MG | 661 MG |