CHILEAN SEABASS vs HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHILEAN SEABASS: 2
vs
HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHILEAN SEABASS | HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 15.3 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 14.7 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHILEAN SEABASS | HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHILEAN SEABASS | HADDOCK SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 6 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 257 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 94 MG | 68 MG |