CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
vs
50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 cal | 240 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 14 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 17.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 588 MG | 1,020 MG |