CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs SOLID LIGHT SKIPJACK TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID LIGHT SKIPJACK TUNA wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
vs
SOLID LIGHT SKIPJACK TUNA: 7
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID LIGHT SKIPJACK TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID LIGHT SKIPJACK TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 14.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 6.4 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID LIGHT SKIPJACK TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 179 MG | 124 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 0 UG | 87 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 319 MG |