CHICAGO FLATS vs WHEAT SUB ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHEAT SUB ROLLS wins in 9 out of 13 nutrient categories
CHICAGO FLATS: 2
vs
WHEAT SUB ROLLS: 9
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICAGO FLATS | WHEAT SUB ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 444 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 8.9 g | |
| Carbs | 72.2 g | 51.1 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICAGO FLATS | WHEAT SUB ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 5.6 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICAGO FLATS | WHEAT SUB ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 111 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4 MG | 5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 778 MG | 456 MG |