CASSEROLE CHILE RELLENO BOWLS vs SLOW COOKED PULLED PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED PULLED PORK wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
CASSEROLE CHILE RELLENO BOWLS: 3
vs
SLOW COOKED PULLED PORK: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CASSEROLE CHILE RELLENO BOWLS | SLOW COOKED PULLED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 149 cal | 130 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 8.5 g | |
| Carbs | 14.1 g | 14.4 g | |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CASSEROLE CHILE RELLENO BOWLS | SLOW COOKED PULLED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.1 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CASSEROLE CHILE RELLENO BOWLS | SLOW COOKED PULLED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 137 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 220 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 310 MG | 380 MG |