BOOM BOOM SHRIMP vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
BOOM BOOM SHRIMP: 3
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BOOM BOOM SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 195 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 14.2 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BOOM BOOM SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BOOM BOOM SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 199 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 558 MG | 132 MG |