BONELESS BACON WRAPPED PORK FILET vs MAPLE HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BONELESS BACON WRAPPED PORK FILET: 3
vs
MAPLE HAM: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BONELESS BACON WRAPPED PORK FILET | MAPLE HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 12.0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BONELESS BACON WRAPPED PORK FILET | MAPLE HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BONELESS BACON WRAPPED PORK FILET | MAPLE HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 308 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 317 MG | 696 MG |