BLACK FOREST THIN SLICED HAM vs SCOTT PETERSEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
BLACK FOREST THIN SLICED HAM: 3
vs
SCOTT PETERSEN: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BLACK FOREST THIN SLICED HAM | SCOTT PETERSEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BLACK FOREST THIN SLICED HAM | SCOTT PETERSEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BLACK FOREST THIN SLICED HAM | SCOTT PETERSEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 938 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 696 MG | 1,571 MG |