BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP vs UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP: 3
vs
UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 31.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 11.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BEER BATTERED TAIL ON SHRIMP | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 65 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 671 MG | 646 MG |