BATTERED FISH FILLETS vs SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 2
vs
SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTERED FISH FILLETS | SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTERED FISH FILLETS | SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTERED FISH FILLETS | SKINLESS BONELESS HADDOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 407 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 75 MG |