BATTERED FISH FILLETS vs TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 3
vs
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BATTERED FISH FILLETS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 239 cal | 96 cal | |
| Protein | 10.6 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 26.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BATTERED FISH FILLETS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BATTERED FISH FILLETS | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 531 MG | 224 MG |