BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN vs 95% LEAN GROUND PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
95% LEAN GROUND PORK wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN: 2
vs
95% LEAN GROUND PORK: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN | 95% LEAN GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 123 cal | |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 21.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.7 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 11.3 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN | 95% LEAN GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACON WRAPPED PORK TENDERLOIN | 95% LEAN GROUND PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 535 MG | 70 MG |