Skip to content
Home Categories Top Foods Compare Search About Blog
Sign In Sign Up Free

Support Nutosa

Enter any amount to donate

$

BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK

Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving

Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET: 4 vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 4 (3 ties)

Overview

Nutrient BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET GROUND BEEF CHUCK Winner
Calories 183 cal 259 cal
Protein 16.9 g 17.0 g
Carbs 0.7 g 0 g
Fat 12.7 g 19.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g Tie
Sugar 0 g 0 g Tie

Vitamins

Vitamin BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET GROUND BEEF CHUCK Winner
Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid 0 MG 0 MG Tie

Minerals

Ad 728x90
Mineral BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET GROUND BEEF CHUCK Winner
Calcium, Ca 14 MG 18 MG
Iron, Fe 1.9 MG 1.6 MG
Potassium, K 0 MG 268 MG
Sodium, Na 585 MG 67 MG
Ad 728x90
Ask AI about Nutrition
Hi! Ask me anything about food and nutrition — health benefits, meal ideas, diets, or any food question.