ALMOND WINDMILL COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALMOND WINDMILL COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALMOND WINDMILL COOKIES: 5
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND WINDMILL COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 387 cal | 406 cal | |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 64.5 g | 59.4 g | |
| Fat | 14.5 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND WINDMILL COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND WINDMILL COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 323 MG | 328 MG |