ALASKA PINK SALMON vs PACIFIC MACKEREL FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKA PINK SALMON wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALASKA PINK SALMON: 5
vs
PACIFIC MACKEREL FILLETS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA PINK SALMON | PACIFIC MACKEREL FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 22.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA PINK SALMON | PACIFIC MACKEREL FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA PINK SALMON | PACIFIC MACKEREL FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 212 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 341 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 476 MG |