AGED BASMATI RICE vs MINNESOTA QUICK COOKING WILD RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MINNESOTA QUICK COOKING WILD RICE wins in 10 out of 16 nutrient categories
AGED BASMATI RICE: 2
vs
MINNESOTA QUICK COOKING WILD RICE: 10
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AGED BASMATI RICE | MINNESOTA QUICK COOKING WILD RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 84.4 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AGED BASMATI RICE | MINNESOTA QUICK COOKING WILD RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 10 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AGED BASMATI RICE | MINNESOTA QUICK COOKING WILD RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 500 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 78 MG | 400 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 5 MG |