A HEALTHY REPLACEMENT FOR MEAT vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
A HEALTHY REPLACEMENT FOR MEAT wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
A HEALTHY REPLACEMENT FOR MEAT: 5
vs
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | A HEALTHY REPLACEMENT FOR MEAT | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 487 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 15.4 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 43.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 12.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | A HEALTHY REPLACEMENT FOR MEAT | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | A HEALTHY REPLACEMENT FOR MEAT | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 103 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.6 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 564 MG | 67 MG |