16OZ CAB PORTERHOUSE STK vs Pork Backribs #2
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
16OZ CAB PORTERHOUSE STK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
16OZ CAB PORTERHOUSE STK: 6
vs
Pork Backribs #2: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 16OZ CAB PORTERHOUSE STK | Pork Backribs #2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 22.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 16OZ CAB PORTERHOUSE STK | Pork Backribs #2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 16OZ CAB PORTERHOUSE STK | Pork Backribs #2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 277 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 62 MG |