WRITING ICING CLASSIC COLORS vs PINK SANDING SUGAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WRITING ICING CLASSIC COLORS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WRITING ICING CLASSIC COLORS: 3
vs
PINK SANDING SUGAR: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WRITING ICING CLASSIC COLORS | PINK SANDING SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 83.3 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WRITING ICING CLASSIC COLORS | PINK SANDING SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WRITING ICING CLASSIC COLORS | PINK SANDING SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 83 MG | 0 MG |