WRIGHT vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WRIGHT wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WRIGHT: 3
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WRIGHT | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 516 cal | |
| Protein | 35.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 48.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WRIGHT | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WRIGHT | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,786 MG | 1,194 MG |